<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Government Considers Dropping Shakespeare Tests for Secondary Students</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shakespearepost.com/2008/07/13/british-government-considers-dropping-secondary-school-shakespeare-exams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shakespearepost.com/2008/07/13/british-government-considers-dropping-secondary-school-shakespeare-exams/</link>
	<description>Shakespeare News from Across the Globe</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.K.Farrar</title>
		<link>http://www.shakespearepost.com/2008/07/13/british-government-considers-dropping-secondary-school-shakespeare-exams/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>A.K.Farrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shakespearepost.com/?p=432#comment-60</guid>
		<description>About time too - one of the reasons tests of Shakespeare were brought in was the 'continuous assessment option' (much used prior to Mr Patten, et al) was too expensive - it had little to do with standards or a need for increasing the amount of Shakespeare studied (in my experience testing actually reduced the depth and amount studied).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About time too - one of the reasons tests of Shakespeare were brought in was the &#8216;continuous assessment option&#8217; (much used prior to Mr Patten, et al) was too expensive - it had little to do with standards or a need for increasing the amount of Shakespeare studied (in my experience testing actually reduced the depth and amount studied).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
